Le vendredi 01 mars 2019 à 07:58 -0600, Eric Blake a écrit : > > The behavior of -f is specified by POSIX: > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/rm.html > > and is specified to suppress prompts and avoid diagnostics on missing > files, but NOT a means to force deletion via changing directory > permissions. For that, you'd need a new option, because we can't > change > the long-specified meaning of -f without breaking scripts.
Well it seems people got spoiled by other OSes where read-only is not- really-read-only-when-you-own-the-file (IIRC vi also ignores permissions in force mode). So could a really-force flag be added? Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
