On 2023-02-05 20:59, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 2023-02-05 11:59, Pádraig Brady wrote:
[...]
Let's leave that as-is, please. If 'wc' can output the correct value
without reading its input, POSIX does not require 'wc' to do the read,
and it seems perverse to modify 'wc' to go to the effort to refuse to
tell the user useful information that the user requested and that 'wc'
knows.
[...]
But while I would agree it's very unlikely to ever be hit in practice,
as I can't think of any reason why one would call wc with its input not
input for reading, wc is meant to report how many bytes it has read, not
the size of its input (though POSIX seems ambiguous on that).
See also (with Pádraig's patch applied):
$ { echo test > file; wc -c; echo test2 >&0; cat file; } 0> file
5
test
test2
wc has lseek()ed to the end of the file even though it was opened in
write-only mode. Compare with:
$ { echo test > file; wc -lc; echo test2 >&0; cat file; } 0> file
wc: 'standard input': Bad file descriptor
0 0
test2
--
Stephane
