On 16/04/2024 at 16:07, Toby Kelsey wrote:
There appears to be a bug with 'ls' when using the '-f' and '-l' options, or at least an inconsistency with the man page. The man page says '-f' list entries in directory order and does not mention any incompatibilities with other options, however I find using it with the '-l' option gives different ouputs depending on the order of options. See the following script log for an example:
It really says -f = do not sort, enable -aU. -U = do not sort It also says -f = disable -ls --color So -l -f = -f takes precedence, -f -l = -l takes precedence. -- Chris Elvidge
