Derek Robert Price wrote:
> Anyone have any objections to this spam filter being applied to the
> info-cvs and bug-cvs lists?
>
> Aside from the "(no subject)" filter which would filter the cvsbug
> generated emails on bug-cvs, of course.
>
> Derek
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: Meta-issue: recent spam surge
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Lars J. Aas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Derek Robert Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I'm not really comfortable modifying list settings on lists I'm not
> > "affiliated with", even if I could. The maintainers for those lists
> > should just pick it up from the mailman settings for the autoconf list...
> > (It's in the Privacy Settings section).
>
> bounce_matching_headers for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Subject:[ (]*no subject[) ]*$
> Subject: *$
> Subject: *[A-Za-z]scribe$
> Subject:.* .*
> Subject:.*[^A-Za-z](product|sex|stock|revenue|sale|rich|toner|manegment|adv)[^A-Za-z]
^^^^^^^^^^
Is this a typo? I hope it wasn't intended to filter messages with "management" in the
subject, e.g.:
"CVS management of /etc - permissions problem"
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs/2001-September/019826.html
"release management with CVS"
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs/2001-September/019846.html
Filtering out messages with "product" in the subject prohibits an innocent message
like:
"Questions about your product "
http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs/2001-May/014773.html
And anyone that has a problem checking in a Rich Text Format document had better not
state that in the subject.
dtayl
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
