* Larry Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-16 20:23]:
> Fixed long ago in the development version, but thanks anyway.
Problems (and answers) like this regularly pop up here.
Could this be an indication that there has been "enough"
bug fixing to justify a new official release?
For probably many companies it is infeasible to use
tools which cannot be identified clearly (for example
"cvs 1.11.1p1 plus bugfixes for foo and bar").
It would be nice if we could update our company's cvs
server (and clients) to 1.11.2 (or whatever) in the
not-so-distant future to benefit from these bugfixes.
Kind regards
Ingolf
--
Ingolf Steinbach Jena-Optronik GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++49 3641 200-147
PGP: 0x7B3B5661 213C 828E 0C92 16B5 05D0 4D5B A324 EC04
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
