Larry Jones wrote:
>Derek Robert Price writes:
>
>
>>I think the executable available on cvshome.org wasn't compiled with
>>CVS_BADROOT properly undef'd re:
>><http://ccvs.cvshome.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72>. CVS_BADROOT is
>>undefined correctly in windows-NT/options.h, so I'm guessing that
>>somehow src/options.h got used instead when the executable was
>>compiled.
>>
>>
>
>I suspect this is a side-effect of getting rid of src/options.h.in and
>the accompanying autoconf magic.
>
>-Larry Jones
>
>Yep, we'd probably be dead by now if it wasn't for Twinkies. -- Calvin
>
>
Hah. And I thought the generation was pointless since the file was just
copied. Anyhow, I'm turning most of the options.h options into
configure script options at the moment. And removing some others. I
may change my mind as I consider the implications of blurring the
distinction between system configuration and compile time options, but
it seems to me that configure already does a lot of that and moving the
options makes sense.
Which reminds me, anyone out there still compiling with RELATIVE_REPOS
undefined? There's been a comment in the code that this would be
removed for over 3 years. Speak now or forever hold your peace.
Derek
--
*8^)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get CVS support at http://ximbiot.com
--
If that plane leaves the ground and you're not with him, you'll regret it.
Maybe not today and maybe not tomorrow, but soon and for the rest of your life.
- Humphrey Bogart as Rick, _Casablanca_
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
