On Saturday 26 February 2005 00:27, Derek Price wrote: > Frank Hemer wrote: > |> I was just glancing at that patch and I think I can implement > |> what Steve did much more succinctly, so I'm going to take a shot > |> at it. The most important thing for your patch is probably to use > |> the naming scheme: `.XXX'. > | > | So I'll wait for your commit then. > > Here's a question: Should the commitids be cached in CVSROOT/val-tags > in some form? I think so. What is CVSNT doing in this regard?
Cvsnt seems not to cache the commitids. I don't think it is reasonable to cache here because _every_ commit would be cached, bloating val-tags but not gaining any performance. Regards, Frank -- - The LinCVS Team - http:/www.lincvs.com _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
