-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Hemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However I didn't have a better idea. Using .base instead can be similar
> miss-interpreted since there is BASE. How about replacing '.root' with
> '.tail', and replacing '.origin' with '.root'?
Hmmm... I like replacing '.origin' with '.root' and I agree that .base
is too confusing with BASE. I have a mild dislike of '.tail' even though
it does have some symmetry with HEAD... (I keep thinking that 'tail file'
gives me the latest bits appended to the file.)
If you don't like '.first' (mentioned in a previous e-mail), perhaps
'.branch' is a another alternative name that could be used as the first
revision on the branch?
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFCJfXP3x41pRYZE/gRAk/JAJ97BT7DuULnxk/JQekzWDn6xD0tbgCeJLSg
p80lIMBfQqQCXaZl/kzz1C0=
=TA9V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
