-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark D. Baushke wrote:
> I honestly don't know if it is a good idea to > introduce this patch to feature in this way at > this time. > > What do the other maintainers think of this kind > of extension? I don't have a strong opinion either way. Some users might find it useful to have read ACLs made available this way. Me, I prefer to offload any ACL decisions on the file system since it is almost certainly more secure. As long as I don't have to do the work, though, and without thinking deeply about your discussion about whether soft or hard failures are better, I have no objections to this patch. Cheers, Derek -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCgMRDLD1OTBfyMaQRAs1XAJ9Pu3LSUAoKAPaF67L8oiKlIfBuugCfXay/ t2xW87sMgKYXgcbk4bW4PdI= =D8vS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
