-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Conrad T. Pino wrote:
>1. Who is able to run the OS/2 feature and stable builds? I don't know. Ocassionally, someone pokes their head in and sends us a patch to get it up and running, but I think it's been at least a year since that has happened. >2. If no one steps forward to assist with building should >we attempt a fix that can't be tested nevertheless? The policy, as I thought was documented in HACKING or somesuch, is that we do not bother. I can't find the original text in a quick scan, however. In general, if there is no way to tell if it works, what is the point? In reality, I ocassionally cut and paste a new function or API change when I change it elsewhere, but more often lately, I don't bother. If someone decides to fix the platform up, it should be easy enough to trace the missing functions to their counter-parts in src, lib. or wherever. Cheers, Derek -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCmlwmLD1OTBfyMaQRAqHtAKCtAxvzfZs0P2NUZvsPfXcUxRiyEwCgghx+ CDzN9M0fdJ8XuA1afbezSd8= =+LUk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
