Follow-up Comment #18, patch #4573 (project cvs):
I think Mark's example about lost PERL code is a compelling argument for
leaving the status quo. Your patch bypasses the inconvenience of extraneous
checkins at the expense of potentially losing valuable information.
Applying the wrong -k options to a file is an extremely common mistake, which
even experienced CVS users can make.
I think the correct decision has been made.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=4573>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
