On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:01:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It does the same thing even without the rm. Updating to a particular > revision (whether numeric or symbolic) *always* sets a sticky tag to > that revision. What makes you think BASE should be special?
1. Its rather useless if that's proper behavior. 'cvs up -r BASE' should give you back the same file you had checked out - for instance if you hacked the file to pieces and just want the original file back. 2. mdb said so. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
