Hi Ben, > > My proposal therefore is to simplify the return path from > > remote_expect and except from keeping the current special handling > > of the error exception intact, pass all the other conditions expect > > might have produced up to the caller. Below is the proposed > > implementation. It makes a loop like above behave as expected. > > I agree that remote_expect should behave as similar to expect as > possible to adhere to the principle of least surprise. I will apply > your patch now, thanks.
Excellent! Thanks a lot. I'll work on a similar change to gdb_expect then. Good luck with your daughter! Maciej _______________________________________________ Bug-dejagnu mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-dejagnu
