Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > GNU ed 1.15-pre2 is ready for testing here > http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/ed/ed-1.15-pre2.tar.lz ... > Please, test it and report any bugs you find.
Are you interested in reports of spurious gcc warnings? It isn't an ed bug but rather a gcc bug. Using gcc 6.3.0 and gcc 8.2.0 are both opinionated about whitespace and indention and noisy compiling the main_loop.c file. gcc -Wall -W -O2 -c -o main_loop.o main_loop.c main_loop.c: In function ‘exec_command’: main_loop.c:616:15: warning: this ‘while’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] case '#': while( *(*ibufpp)++ != '\n' ) ; ^~~~~ main_loop.c:617:15: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘while’ break; ^~~~~ Huh? I disagree that the break were indented as if it were part of the while statement since it is at the same level and not indented beyond. That simply looks to be an insufficiency of understanding of indentation by gcc. The code looks quite clear as is to me. And strange that gcc isn't similarly confused about the various 'if' statements that are the same thing. If it did/didn't approve of one then I would think it should be the same for the other. Since it is a gcc indentation opinion I'll note that if the ';' is put on the next line then gcc is silent. case '#': while( *(*ibufpp)++ != '\n' ) ; break; And also if the label is on a line by itself. case '#': while( *(*ibufpp)++ != '\n' ) ; break; I am also happy to ignore the warning too since it is completely spurious and indicating a gcc bug rather than an ed bug. Bob _______________________________________________ bug-ed mailing list bug-ed@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ed