> On 16 Dec 2022, at 12:55, Antonio Diaz Diaz <anto...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Sam James wrote: >> I understand. It's just awkward to then package using the packaging we >> have [...] if a package is set up for PGP signing. >> >> I was hoping it'd be easy to add one in. I may just wait until 1.19 is out. > > If I understand it correctly, it is easier for me to upload a .sig file than > for you to package a tarball without a .sig file. > > As this version of ed has important changes, I'm interested in it being as > widely tested as possible. So I have just uploaded a .sig file. > > Hope this helps.
that is indeed a big help - thank you! Best, sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
