Antonio wrote: >> Now I need to think about how to fix this reliably without ignoring >> SIGPIPE for commands that do read from their standard input
Would it make sense to take that "SIGPIPE" as meaning:
* Ok - it's done reading. That's cool. Close that fd.
* Now let's wait around until that process exits,
or until we receive a SIGINT or perhaps similar?
--
Paul Jackson
[email protected]
