"Daniel A. Palm" wrote: > > Hi. > Maybe I'm crazy or doing something wrong, but I swear that the -S option in the >'du' utility > doesnt do what it is supposed to. It is supposed to not show the subdirectories > but it still does. The output of 'du' is the same as 'du -S' I think. > > I'm using RedHat 7.0 > on an i386. > > -Dan Palm > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Dan, I think that the -S option is used to exclude the amount of subdirectory bytes in the total. Well, at least, that's what it does :-) Yoda:/home/matthew/libxml-1.8.11/doc>$ /usr/local/bin/du 871 ./html 943 . Yoda:/home/matthew/libxml-1.8.11/doc>$ /usr/local/bin/du -S 871 ./html 72 . Regards, Matthew _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
