cyrus wrote: > I believe Paul's suggestion was that md5sum be modified to support > the "-C" option, rather than modify dd to support internal checksumming. > It doesn't currently exist. > > -- > cyrus. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I get it know. I'm still wondering if this hypothetical md5sum -C option would output checksums for every byte. I think that's still the goal.... Matthew _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Dave Dittrich
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Paul Eggert
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Dave Dittrich
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Paul Eggert
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 cyrus
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Paul Eggert
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 cyrus
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Paul Eggert
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Matt Schalit
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 cyrus
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Matt Schalit
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Paul Eggert
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] GNU fileutils 4.1 Dave Dittrich