Gary Fischman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The version of "ls" that is shipped with RedHat 7.1 appears to > incorrectly display the file date, now that its 2002. It shows all > files with a date after last June as being in the current year, not > 2001. > > Is the problem with "ls" or is it caused by something else?
Do you mean that the year isn't shown for files less than 6mo old, but that it is shown for older files? That's the way ls is supposed to work. That's the default. You can make ls print the entire date/time with --full-time. _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
