> Hi there, > Facts: > 1. Our product is a Backup-Restore product. > 2. On HP11.00 Platforms, when Unix Domain Sockets are created, there is > a /tmp/<socket_path_name> created for the UNIX PATH. > > Issue: Our Backup Products are able to backup this empty file with type > "SOCK" (I_ISSOCK = TRUE). But when we restore, the same file, system > does not let us create a file with MODE as SOCKET... (As that is what is
How are you trying to create the socket? You are using the the socket(2) system call? That is the normal way to create unix domain sockets. I personally had never considered it possible to create unix domain sockets with mknod, either system call or shell command. I am shocked and amazed that you are trying to do this with shell scripts and are using the external GNU mknod(1) command and not using a C program which would use the operating system kernel's mknod(2) or socket(2) commands. That is truly remarkable! The GNU mknod(1) command just calls the kernel mknod(2) command and will do whatever the kernel allows it to do. > backed up). But what we find from our experience is: the same types are > able to be restored successfully on Solaris and Linux. WHy we can't do that > on HP or is there any way of doing it? Could you furnish an example of creating a unix domain socket using the standalone GNU mknod command? That sounds interesting and I did not realize that was possible. On the systems where this works can you furnish the version of the command that you are using? While the mknod command was designed to make 'special files' the BSD folks who created BSD network sockets created their own interface and I don't think any of that interface ever made it back into the mknod command. I am probably wrong here, though. It just does not seem too useful to create a unix domain socket using a shell command since you would not be able to keep hold of the file descriptor. You would need to create an interface where it passed the file descriptor to child processes or some such and that gets messy really fast. Unix domain sockets are not like pipes where you can just open and close them later on by random processes. Thanks Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
