On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:12:08PM +0200, David T-G wrote: > ...and then Bernd Jendrissek said... > % > % I just noticed that an sh-utils RPM I built didn't have su. It > appears > % coreutils-4.5.2 would have the same problem. I want to do staged > installs > % as an unpriviledged user. (Downloading 4.5.3 now; ignore me if it's > fixed.) > > That's great, and thanks for the contribution, but ... um, what does > this > have to do with fileutils? You probably should send this to the
Nothing whatsoever, other than that I thought coreutils had gulped up fileutils too. Besides, it's fixed in 4.5.3 anyway. Sorry for bothering the list(s) :) > HAND More sleep would be nice. _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils