Hi Alfred, > I saw that 4.1.9 is from alpha.gnu.org; is Red Hat just too > bleeding edge again here..? > > Could you try the latest version of GNU coreutils [1] (it is a merge > of textutils, sh-utils and fileutils) and see if the behaviour you are > seeing exists there?
I compiled coreutils 4.5.4 on both Red Hat 7.2 and 8.0, just to be sure. I used no configure switches besides --prefix. The coreutils behave identical on both platforms. This is what happens (remember, "testdir2" is a symbolic link to "testdir1", which contains a file, "testfile"): # rm -i testdir2/ rm: remove directory `testdir2/'? y rm: cannot remove directory `testdir2/': Is a directory It doesn't ask to delete the file "testfile" (fileutils 4.1.9 ask), and it actually doesn't delete anything. Second case: # rm -rf testdir2/ rm: cannot remove `testdir2/': Not a directory Nothing gets deleted, even not the testdir2 symlink. ... The following things can be identified as errors; they're at least irritating and/or not consistent with the fileutils 4.1 (latest stable): * "rm -i testdir2/" doesn't identify testdir2 as a symlink, but as a directory (which it actually isn't) * "rm -i testdir2/" results in "cannot remove directory" both under fileutils 4.1.9 and coreutils 4.5.4. Amazingly, under fileutils 4.1.9 it says: "Not a directory", while under coreutils 4.5.4 it says: "Is a directory" when used with "-i", and "Not a directory" when used with "-rf". At least this is definitely inconsistent within the latest coreutils. * The message "rm: cannot remove directory `testdir2/': Is a directory" is a contradiction in terms. * The commands "rm -i testdir2/" and "rm -rf testdir2/" end up in different results when compared to fileutils 4.1. Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
