> But I don't see why mv should be a thin wrapper around rename(). It > already does some extra things like moving files between filesystems, so > couldn't mv detect the case of 'different filenames, same file' and do > something a bit more sensible?
After the coreutils-5.0 release, I'll look at this again. I will probably end up writing yet another rename wrapper and autoconf test to detect and work around this failure. I've added it to the TODO list. _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils