On Friday 07 of May 2010 10:08:08 James Youngman wrote: > Thanks for spotting this. I can see the bug simply by inspecting > your fix. But, is there any kind of test case which actually > demonstrates the problem? If we add a relevant test we can protect > ourselves against reintroducing this kind of bug, too.
As I said, I hit the bug in 4.4.2. The code that the patch addresses works in 4.5.9 without the patch, but not in 4.4.2. The failing test-case was execdir-multiple.exp. It simply broke the traversal as soon as the first execdir had been executed. FWIW the full backport for upstream bugs #19593 and #27563 is attached to the corresponding Fedora bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/493143 Kamil
