Follow-up Comment #10, bug #38092 (project findutils):
> The other obvious - and more readable - way to do this is to
> split the argument file into however many chunks you need.
> Then just run ...
Couldn't I skip xargs completely with this type of a for loop?
for f in $(cat files); do process $f; done &
Manually fiddling with argument files kind of defeats the purpose of using
xargs in the first place...
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38092>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
