On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 6:05 PM Bernhard Voelker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Anyway, I think with the above argument about the existing functionality > in -printf, which would be redundant to the current time-style suggestion, > we can close the issue, right? I would prefer to leave the decision up to you. Because 1. I've not read the whole thread and 2. I am not sure that find's -printf, as it stands now, is up to the job of reproducing the output format that the user wants in this case. Certainly I'm not volunteering to enhance -printf right now, should it turn out that that would be needed. James.
