Miguel Ángel <[email protected]> writes: > OTOH, I think code correctness should also matter, even more when > correct code does not have a noticeable decrement of the execution speed > neither It loss readability.
For you, implementing the GtkBuilder support is more important task right? I don't mean that we won't fix this, but I'd suggest you could ignore this minor issue for now and concentrate on polishing your first priority patch. Somewhat related: <http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RefactoringHat> > This code also could be used by a library, think about a GPL IDE that > wants POT file generation on the fly. You could fork a new process each > time you want to parse the files, or you can build xgettext as a library > (very easy with automake and libtool) and only call functions. This way > the leak would be exposed to the application. I personally think it wouldn't be too late, even if we fixed this after we got a practical bug report. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno
