Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59674 (project gforth):
We don't know what kind of number something we didn't identify actually is
(ASCII code? Bitmask? Count of something?). Therefore, smart. falls back to .
if it doesn't know. . is printed in the current base. The user probably
knows.
I think the status-line should invoke ... as is, and if we decide that decimal
. with "#" prefixed is the right fallback, we should do it in smart., not in
the status-line code.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59674>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
