Hi, > I wanted to ask if there is a plan to move from CVS to a more modern > version control system like git? Quite recently emacs has moved to > it and although it was quite painful it succeeded in the end.
I'm investigating about this. The most important point is to reduce obstacles of the shift. Subversion has consideration to CVS user, and Mercurial has consideration to Subversion user. As the result, I'm thinking Mercurial is best up to now. Regards, Shigio 2015-02-17 5:12 GMT+09:00 rchmielarz . <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > I wanted to ask if there is a plan to move from CVS to a more modern > version control system like git? Quite recently emacs has moved to it and > although it was quite painful it succeeded in the end. > > I'm asking because a couple of weeks ago I started using global and I > wanted to add native support for TTCN to global instead of using it through > ctags which means I can't look for function and symbol references. > > I looked on the website then and when I saw that the project is still > using CVS I thought that it's probably dead and I should look elsewhere. > But fortunately glancing at the mailing list it seems it is still alive. > Still, the feeling of a project being dormant prevails so maybe the move to > git would give it a nice stir. > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Radek > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-global mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global > > -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
