Hi,
> htags could use support for multiple --call-tree --callee-tree options
>
> so for example:
>
>   htags --suggest --call-tree=foo_prog,foo_call_tree
> --call-tree=bar_prog,bar_call_tree

I agree with you. Is this also OK?

htags --call-tree=foo_prog --call-tree=foo_call_tree \
        --call-tree=bar_prog --call-tree=bar_call_tree

>   At present there is a slight inconsistancy within the page
> because the source files section shows all the mains but for the
> call/callee tree section a single program from the source tree must be
> chosen (because cflow ends up with only a single main for a given
> invocation).

You are right.

Regards,
Shigio


2016-04-09 6:31 GMT+09:00 Britton Kerin <[email protected]>:

> so for example:
>
>   htags --suggest --call-tree=foo_prog,foo_call_tree
> --call-tree=bar_prog,bar_call_tree
>
> This way the call tree section of the generated web page could be
> consistent with the support for multiple main() function and general
> way htags --suggest works in which all the source files are analyzed
> together.  At present there is a slight inconsistancy within the page
> because the source files section shows all the mains but for the
> call/callee tree section a single program from the source tree must be
> chosen (because cflow ends up with only a single main for a given
> invocation).
>
> The alternative is to not used --suggest but instead supply the file
> list manually and produce separate pages for different programs that
> come from a single code base.  But this is less convenient and
> involves a lot of almost-identical pages for source bases that produce
> programs that share a lot of common code.
>
> Britton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-global mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
>



-- 
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________
Bug-global mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global

Reply via email to