> I don't see any way to get a consistently meaningful evaluation of > induced errors. Judging intent is best left to humans.
One way to handle the "deliberate" error is to have an option where the user could tell gnubg to ignore a particular error in calculating an overall match result. No inference by gnubg, but an extra field in the data structure (and an extra gui control). The same approach could have helped me ignore the .68 "mis-click" error I made in a recent online match -- where I moved the checkers in the wrong order leaving three blots in my board instead of closing it! David Levy _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
