Christian Anthon wrote: > Hi all, > > users who want gnubg from source currently has to either download the > 2½ years old 0.14.3 version or to use cvs. On windows users may choose > between the old gtk-1 version and the current cvs based version > provided by max. This way we are currently releasing bugs in to the > wild. > > Perhaps we should tag and branch the 20061011 version as version > 0.15-stable and the versions released from cvs as 0.16-unstable?
Sounds like a good idea/starting point for some more structured releases. I guess we can tag the code in cvs or do you mean create a 0.15-stable branch (so in theory bug fixes could be done on this branch)? Perhaps we could improve the download page on the website to include both versions? Jon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
