>I guess it also makes sence to put "my" stuff on the gnubg page >itself. On my webpage I slowly run out of space, so I have to delete >more and more older snapshots. > >I'll work on it at the next weekend, putting the rpms and snapshots >(stable and main) on gnubng.org.
OK. I've created a WinDistrib directory under /media/, you could create two others for the code snapshots and the rmps. Do you plan to have your automatic process creating cvs snapshots directly on gnubg.org ? That would be great ! If possible, create the snapshots from the two branches (MAIN and rel_0_15),something like : gnubg-sources-0.15-stable-20061114.tar.gz (stable branch) gnubg-sources-0.16-devel-20061114.tar.gz (main branch) I know that Christian creates his source archives doing a "source distrib" ... don't know exactly what that is, but it a bit different from a pure snapshot of the cvs sources. Maybe you can get in touch with him for details ... >I a former thread you also discussed the versioning of gnubg. I >suggest to take at least 0.16 for the stable branch. All rpms I >built (for suse and redhat) had either 0.15 or 0.15-1 as >version-release, and it would be difficult for linux users to >upgrade a "new" 0.15 from the "old" 0.15-1. > >0.16 also somehow indicates that we reorganised the stuff a little >bit ;-). I agree. Only problem is that the repository has a branch tag named rel_0_15, hence it should be renamed to rel_0_16 to avoid (additional) confusion. Is this possible Christian ? Playing with branch tag is somehow tricky ... MaX. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg