* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070725 18:49]:
> Don't we know that truncated rollouts for cube decisions are 
> susceptible to considerable evaluation systematic uncertainty?
> (I never trust a truncated rollout on a cube decision, but I'm
> pretty hardcore.  :)  By making that one of the default options
> does it build a false sense of security for the user who may
> not know this?

Afaik this problem only occurs when you use odd truncation and even
plies or vice versa (according to a statement by Daniel Murphy). I did a
lot of truncated rollouts of positions and few of them also with 2ply
full but didn't experience any substantial "odds" besides those where
truncated _and_ full rollouts showed that 2ply eval was wrong.

Ciao

Achim



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to