* Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080328 10:12]: > Hi Achim, > > I've seen this kind of error before. It means that your nvidia and > normal opengl setup has been mixed up. Nothing much we can do from > this end as the include and lib paths are setup automatically. I'm > guessing that suse tries to allow easy switching between normal opengl > and nvidia opengl and that you are linking against a wrong lib. Report > upstream or try the official nvidia .run driver :)
You were right: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnubg $ ls -l /usr/lib/libGL.* /usr/lib/libGL.la /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.0.9755 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.0.9755 belongs to Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnubg $ ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL* /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.169.09 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.169.09 belongs to Nvidia. After linking /usr/lib/libGL.so to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 it compiled. What will happen when I make a rpm based on Nvidia and someone has either only Mesa or an ATI card with their libs? Ciao Achim _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
