Christian Anthon schrieb:
Hi Achim,
I'm not exactly sure what your point is, but since the correct 2ply
move falls outside the 0.160 limit of the "normal" move filter used at
0ply, it is never evaluated at 2ply.
The point is not a technical bug but the fact that gnubg totally
misevaluates a position at 0ply that actually should be handled easily.
I put some more positions at http://www.acepoint.de/index.php?id=37. This
section will be extended from time to time.
Another idea is to open a section at www.gnubg.org that can be filled by
readers and users also.
Ciao
Achim
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
