On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Massimiliano Maini <[email protected]> wrote: > > motiv4u <[email protected]> wrote on 03/02/2009 15:26:26: > > Uh, I'm not pointing the finger, far from that. He's simlpy the only one > that can work this one out. He was already aware of the issue. >
I couldn't understand Jon's workaround. How can it work, If we are adding anything but raw evaluations to the cache. >> I guess it is enough. When I build a Windows build myself - including >> Christian's change of February 1st -this does not happen. I have no >> clue why yours build still does. > > OK, maybe I'm getting lost with timestamps and file versions ... I'll wait > for tomorrow's snapshot and see. > Check the changelog. Christian. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
