Would it be asked too much to integrate the priority levels in the rollout window? Or offer a possible change when the (not yet implemented) pause button is pushed?
N. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Christian Anthon<[email protected]> wrote: > At least in the MT version it should be fairly straight forward to > pause the threads after the current game(s) are done. > > Christian. > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, boomslang<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Sometimes while doing a rollout I would (temporary) like to give CPU >> priority to other tasks. Switching to task manager (I am on XP) and lowering >> the base priority is a bit cumbersome and sometimes there are more instances >> of gnubg running so it is difficult to choose the right one in the list. A >> simple 'pause' button (or even a 'background' button) would be nice. Not >> sure if it is easy to implement, though. >> >> Thx, >> >> boomslang >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bug-gnubg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > -- "He is no fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose." -Jim Elliot _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
