On 21 April 2011 17:01, Christian Anthon <christian.ant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The evaluation speed tool always sucked, and it sucks twice with > threads. Do a rollout of some kind with a constant seed to test the > speed. > > Thanks for the explanation, Christian. Rollout results match up more to my initial expectations (see below). Asking for more threads than the 8 available does not improve speeds. Performance tails off as the number of threads approaches the maximum. I put this down to a combination of: priority set to "idle", other tasks being run on the computer, the OS overhead, the thread-management overhead. If the speed evaluation is broken, I suggest it be removed from the menu until it is fixed (if ever). Cheers, Ian Rollout of inital 43: 13/9 13/10 1296 trials on "expert" settings. Position ID: 4HPwATDgc/ABMA Match ID: cAkOAAAAAAAA Threads Time (sec) 1 252 2 129 4 73 6 57 7 54 8 53 9 52 10 52 16 53
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
