On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Michael Petch wrote:
I'm thinking we should upgrade our Wiki (if we intend to keep it)
Is the wiki really useful ? There weren't many updates there, were they ?
Moreover, the documentation is in a sorry state. There is :
- something in CVS, incomplete and not up to date
- something at http://www.gnu.org/software/gnubg/manual/ (gnu.org,
hence managed by the FSF folks, I suppose), apparently an older version of
the above
- something in the wiki, similar to parts of the CVS document (maybe
Christian Anthon pulled what was in the wiki when he rewrote the manual).
Shouldn't we do something like :
- import recent changes from the wiki into the CVS document and probably
close the wiki, at least as far as documentation is concerned
- have the pages at gnubg.org updated from CVS, say weekly or monthly
- overhaul the manual
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
