On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
For example, if you slapped a version number on each version for which someone felt inspired to provide new "official" Windows binaries, that would probably be about right.
That seems reasonable. The version numbers have been like 0.n.0 with the third part unused for ages. Maybe we could set the latter to "current" (or "devel", or whatever) in the CVS head and Michael would change that to an increasing number in the copy he would use when building binaries (plus a source snapshot).
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
