Philippe Michel <philippe.mich...@sfr.fr> writes:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Russ Allbery wrote:

>> Would be fine here, although I'm surprised it would make much
>> difference.  For C, it normally doesn't.  Are you thinking about doing
>> that just to get better compiler warnings?

> This would be to be able to use restricted pointers.

Ah!  Yeah, I can't think of any problems there.

-- 
Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org)              <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
Bug-gnubg@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to