Philippe Michel <philippe.mich...@sfr.fr> writes: > On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Would be fine here, although I'm surprised it would make much >> difference. For C, it normally doesn't. Are you thinking about doing >> that just to get better compiler warnings? > This would be to be able to use restricted pointers. Ah! Yeah, I can't think of any problems there. -- Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg