On 2017-12-22 21:08, Marcell Fulop wrote: > You are actually right. I never gave it long enough time before killed > the seemingly unresponsive gnubg process but after waiting about 2 > mins on a mid-2012 MacbookPro, it just started with XQuartz as it used > to work before.
Thanks for trying it out. I have an even older and slower 2011 macmini. I experienced the behavior before and had mentioned it in the readme.1st file. Usually it is only slow the first time it is launched. Future launches are usually much faster. Now it has me curious how it work on Mac OS Sierra the previous version. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
