_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
Can anyone confirm the score of a recent version of gnubg vs. pubeval? I
hacked the source and found that gnubg v1.06 averaged +1.1ppg (82% wins)
over 10k games, but a recent paper Papahristou & Refanidis (2017) quotes
+0.60 ppg which is only marginally better than TD-Gammon (+0.59). My
number seems high, but +0.6 seems too low considering how much effort
went into optimizing the gnubg code.
- [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score Robert Edgar
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score Øystein Schønning-Johansen
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score Ian Shaw
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score Philippe Michel
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval score Øystein Schønning-Johansen
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Gnubg pubeval sc... Philippe Michel
- [Bug-gnubg] Bug in gnubg pub... Robert Edgar
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug in ... Philippe Michel
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug... Philippe Michel