A personal note, if I may. Back in the day I dabbled with rating adjusted equity tables, i.e. having the stronger player use an adjusted equity table based on the rating difference.
I was never able to make it work. If anything, it ended up with the higher rated "player" doing worse. It's possible I implemented it wrong, but I would like to see some evidence first ... Also, using different equity tables rarely makes a difference in actual play. Again I struggled to prove that one equity table is much better in practice than others. With todays computing power it should be much easier to set up experiments. Anyone up to the task? (Ian might remember how I distributed the rollouts for the net training. I could not have done it without you or the others!!!) -Joseph On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 05:12, Ian Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks David. > > > > That T-12 is very interesting. I see that the subsequent tables are based > on an increasing cubeless win % by 1% per 50 rating points. > > > > The Elo formula gives a higher win rate for a given rating (in a 1-point > match) than the equivalent Jacobs Table. > > > > *Table #* > > *Page* > > *Rating point difference* > > *Jacobs Table cpw* > > *Elo cpw* > > T-13 > > 32 > > 0 (even) > > 50.0 > > 50.0 > > T-15 > > 34 > > 100 > > 52.0 > > 52.9 > > T-17 > > 36 > > 200 > > 54.0 > > 55.7 > > T-19 > > 38 > > 300 > > 56.0 > > 58.6 > > > > I’ll try to construct the xml files for the tables over the next few days. > > > > -- Ian > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 23 August 2022 17:33 > *To:* Ian Shaw <[email protected]>; 'Øystein Schønning-Johansen' < > [email protected]>; 'Ezequiel Galarce' <[email protected]>; 'bug-gnubg' > <[email protected]> > *Subject:* RE: GNU Backgammon > > > > Ian et al, > > > > I also included T-12 which gives the parameters for subsequent tables. Let > me know if you want more. > > > > I’m also not sure how happy the list-serv is with 5MB of attachments. I > can find other ways to send them if need be. > > > > Best, > > > > David > > > > *From:* Ian Shaw <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2022 12:59 AM > *To:* public@booksongamingcom <[email protected]>; 'Øystein > Schønning-Johansen' <[email protected]>; 'Ezequiel Galarce' < > [email protected]>; 'bug-gnubg' <[email protected]> > *Subject:* RE: GNU Backgammon > > > > Hi David, > > > > From > https://bkgm.com/articles/Sengoku/GraphicalMatchEquity/FishEffects/index.html > I understand that these are the tables used for compiling the METs. > > > > Since we have a jac50, I assume that one would be T-14. > > If you could send a picture of T-17 and T-19, that would be great. > > > > *Table #* > > *Page* > > *Rating point difference* > > T-13 > > 32 > > 0 (even) > > T-15 > > 34 > > 100 > > T-17 > > 36 > > 200 > > T-19 > > 38 > > 300 > > > > Thanks, > > Ian Shaw > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 23 August 2022 00:29 > *To:* Ian Shaw <[email protected]>; 'Øystein Schønning-Johansen' < > [email protected]>; 'Ezequiel Galarce' <[email protected]>; 'bug-gnubg' > <[email protected]> > *Subject:* RE: GNU Backgammon > > > > I have a copy of the book. There are more than 60 tables in it, but if > anyone knows which one(s) you’re looking for, I’m happy to send along > photos. > > > > Best, > > > > David Levy > > > > *From:* Bug-gnubg <[email protected]> *On > Behalf Of *Ian Shaw > *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2022 1:34 PM > *To:* Øystein Schønning-Johansen <[email protected]>; Ezequiel Galarce < > [email protected]>; bug-gnubg <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: GNU Backgammon > > > > There was a table in the book. Tom Keith refers to it in one of his > articles on bkgm.com. > > > > If I can resurrect an old hard drive, I'll have a look. > > > > It ought to be possible to generate fish tables from first principles, > assuming a win rate and gammon rate per player. > > > > I think Jacobs used 24% gammon rate, which is higher than most. > > > > Regards, > > *Ian Shaw* > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Bug-gnubg <bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnuorg > <[email protected]>> on behalf of > Øystein Schønning-Johansen <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2022 5:08:30 PM > *To:* Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]>; bug-gnubg <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: GNU Backgammon > > > > Hmmm.... > > > > If my archive remembers correctly there never was a jac200 table. I don't > have a copy of "Can a Fish Taste Twice as Good?", is it even a table in > that book? I find no file called jac200.xml in the CVS attic either. So if > there was a file called jac200,xml it must have been a local contribution > that never was checked in. > > > > The guy who contributed this was named Craig Campbell. (Must be 20 years > ago or so) Is it possible to get hold of him? > > > > -Øystein > > > > man. 22. aug. 2022 kl. 17:27 skrev Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]>: > > I don't know, I'm asking the creator of the equity table, maybe he has it > > > > El lun., 22 ago. 2022 16:06, Ian Shaw <[email protected]> escribió: > > H Ezequiel, > > > > Now that you mention it, I think you’re right. I wonder why it’s been > omitted from the installation. > > > > Does anyone here have a copy of the jac200 MET? > > > > -- Ian > > > > *From:* Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 22 August 2022 15:01 > *To:* Ian Shaw <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: GNU Backgammon > > > > Hello, I have contacted the creator of "jac050" and "jac100" and he told > me that he thinks he remembers that he had made a "jac200", I don't have > any data. > > > > El lun., 22 ago. 2022 12:51, Ian Shaw <[email protected]> escribió: > > Hi Ezequiel, > > > > I don’t think the jac200 table is available on line. > > > > If you have the raw data, it’s easy to make a MET that gnubg can use. I > could create one if you can find the data > > > > Regards, > > Ian > > > > > > *From:* Ezequiel Galarce <[email protected]> > *Sent:* 19 August 2022 22:19 > *To:* Ian Shaw <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: GNU Backgammon > > > > Hello good evening, can you get the equity table "jac200.xml"? > > > > El vie., 19 ago. 2022 14:54, Ian Shaw <[email protected]> escribió: > >
