Hi, Philippe Michel <philippe.mich...@free.fr> writes: > Currently gnubg uses relatively obscure names for its skill levels. > > In the player settings, which is stronger between World Class, Supremo, > Grandmaster is not obvious at first sight. > > In the analysis results, Supernatural and Awful are a bit awkward (the > latter is excluded from the Japanese translation!) [snip] > For the analysis results we could use the denominations from BMAB > (https://bgmastersab.com/about) without the 0/1/2/3 subdivisions: > error rate <= 5 Super Grandmaster > <= 8 Grandmaster > <= 13 Master > <= 20 Advanced > <= 32 Intermediate > else either Casual or Beginner
I agree with eliminating "Awful!" from skill-rating. The BMAB PR criteria are long term (100EP) averages. And the gnubg rating is also used to separate cube decision and checker move. Therefore, I think the criteria should be harder. -- TAKAHASHI Kaoru
