Yoann Vandoorselaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >> It will be LGPL, since it's based on the glibc one which is LGPL. ... > Well, there seem to be a few license problem with the dependencies: > cycle-check, dirfd, hash, unistd-safer and xalloc are marked as GPL > only, so the inclusion of FTS using --lgpl will fail.
Yes, that does complicate things. > Apart from that, it sound okay, but I can't tell much from a module > file :-) The other files are not hidden :) They're part of coreutils. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
