Hello, On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:36:46PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Later on, when it was realized that a fix is needed, it was decided to wait > > for Autoconf 2.60, instead of converting gnulib back to the old scheme and > > later again to the new one. > > Right, sure. Btw, can I test this now? Is autoconf CVS HEAD > sufficient? Do I need other tools from CVS?
oops, we got too far. I'm afraid I no longer know what I'm speaking about. :-( What was the problem? That you cannot use AC_LIBOBJ/AC_LIBSOURCE with more than one "lib" subdirectory, right? What was the proposed solution? I'm not sure, I'm afraid I have missed it. But I _think_ that a prerequisite of the solution was that AC_LIBSOURCES and AC_LIBOBJ would take a second parameter which would specify the "group" that the file belongs to. This prerequisite is not in CVS Autoconf. I'm afraid we need a design document for the solution. Then we can implement it. Have I missed it, or it is yet to be written? The following doesn't seem to be much relevant now, but: > I recall some release dependency tree. CVS Automake requires CVS Autoconf. The other dependecies are not relevant here: CVS m4 requires CVS libtool (a.k.a. libtool 2.0). And perhaps CVS libtool depends on something, too... Happy hacking ;-) Stepan _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
