Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The glibc maintainers didn't accept this patch, see: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1439
I can understand why Ulrich would not want such a patch. It's probably hard to justify risking glibc stability for a relatively large change that merely makes working code a little more maintainable and portable to non-gcc compilers. > Ok to install the following? The glibc bug is linked in > config/srclist.txt for future archeological expeditions. Fine with me. I'll be happy to use it in coreutils, once I've made a stable release. _______________________________________________ bug-gnulib mailing list bug-gnulib@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
