Paul Eggert wrote on 2005-11-15:
> I'd like Bruno's opinion on all this before installing into gnulib.
>
> 2005-11-14 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * lib/stdint_.h (intmax_t) [defined intmax_t]: Do not declare.
> (uintmax_t) [defined uintmax_t]: Do not declare.
> (SIZE_MAX) [defined SIZE_MAX]: Do not define.
> This works around a problem if intmax_t.m4 and/or uintmax_t.m4
> and/or size_max.m4 are also used. Problem reported by Mark D. Baushke.
Thanks for applying this patch while I was unavailable.
> #ifdef _STDINT_H_HAVE_INT64
> +# ifndef intmax_t
> typedef int64_t intmax_t;
> +# endif
> +# ifndef uintmax_t
> typedef uint64_t uintmax_t;
> +# endif
I'm worried that we arrive at a situation where
sizeof (intmax_t) != sizeof (uintmax_t),
if the configure.ac has invoked gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T but not gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T
or vice versa. I can see two solutions:
a) Have gl_STDINT_H require gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T and gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T.
b) Merge gl_AC_TYPE_INTMAX_T and gl_AC_TYPE_UINTMAX_T into a single macro
that defines intmax_t and uintmax_t simultaneously.
Which one is better?
Bruno
_______________________________________________
bug-gnulib mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib
